Chancellor Hammond Says FOBT Crackdown Was Put Off Following Gambling Industry’s Lobbying

Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, has confessed that the put off the implementation of the fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) crackdown after lobbying from the industry.

Chancellor Hammond explained that he initially intended to roll out the changes in the gaming duty in April 2019 in order to compensate for the revenue expected to be lost as a result of the reduction of the FOBT maximum stake from £100 to £2. However, gambling operators claimed that the changes could have a devastating impact on their businesses, as about 21,000 jobs could be lost due to the crackdown. As revealed by Chancellor Hammond, it was these claims which made the Treasury decide to roll out the changes next October.

Since the announcement about the expected crackdown implementation, Chancellor of the Exchequer faced extreme criticism that he had put gambling businesses’ interests over gambling addicts’ lives and well-being. This was the first time Mr. Hammond defended himself since the resignation of Tracey Crouch from the role of Minister of Sports and Civil Society last week.

Ms. Crouch has chosen to quit her ministerial role, as she was disappointed with the decision of the UK Government to delay the implementation of the new FOBT rules in October 2019 rather than in April 2019 instead. She has been one of the most eager opponents of the machines and their devastating impact on problem gamblers’ physical, mental and emotional health.

Sensible Decision Was Necessary, Says Chancellor Hammond

Mr. Hammond defended himself, saying that he had “absolutely no love” for the controversial fixed-odds betting machines and thought they were “terrible things”. He, however, noted that the UK Government had to manage the issue in a sensible way, so it needed to find out a measure which will have a significant impact on the gambling industry.

As The Times reported, Mr. Hammond further explained that the reduction of the maximum stake allowed at FOBTs would some day lead to their disappearance. The reason is simple – the machines would no longer be profitable enough for gambling businesses, so the latter would eliminate them themselves. According to the sector’s own estimates, between 15,000 and 21,000 jobs would be lost following the elimination of FOBTs. This, on the other hand, is expected to lead to high-street betting shops closures.

As explained by Chancellor Hammond to the Treasury Committee, the negative consequences for the local gambling industry would not be eliminated through the delay, but by giving such businesses a “sensible period of time” to adapt to the changes and make sure that as many as the expected job losses are dealt through “voluntary redundancy processes”.

The Chancellor of Exchequer said that the timing of the changes was not chosen in correspondence to the Treasury’s wish to keep its gambling tax revenue flow, explaining that a simultaneous increase in the tax owed by the online gambling operators is planned to compensate for the losses.

  • Author
Daniel Williams

Daniel Williams

Daniel Williams has started his writing career as a freelance author at a local paper media. After working there for a couple of years and writing on various topics, he found his interest for the gambling industry.
Daniel Williams
Casino Guardian covers the latest news and events in the casino industry. Here you can also find extensive guides for roulette, slots, blackjack, video poker, and all live casino games as well as reviews of the most trusted UK online casinos and their mobile casino apps.

Related news