Key Moments:
- The NCAA formally requested that the CFTC suspend all college sports prediction markets
- Additionally, the association warned of risks to student-athletes, consumers, and competitive integrity
- Meanwhile, a dispute over Kalshi’s proposed transfer portal contracts intensified regulatory pressure
Concerns Prompt Appeal for Federal Action
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has formally asked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to halt college sports prediction markets. Specifically, the request urges an immediate suspension. The appeal was delivered in a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig on January 14, 2026.
In the letter, the NCAA highlighted growing vulnerabilities created by the rapid expansion of these platforms. As a result, the association warned that existing safeguards are insufficient.
NCAA President Charlie Baker stressed the urgent need for stronger protections. Moreover, he expressed the association’s willingness to work with federal regulators on a clearer framework. According to Baker, current rules fail to protect student-athletes or ensure fair competition.
“Protecting the well-being of student-athletes and the integrity of competition are of the highest priority to the NCAA,” Baker wrote. However, he cautioned that the “haphazard nature” of prediction markets poses serious risks to both.
Parallels to Sports Betting and Regulatory Gaps
According to the NCAA, college sports prediction markets closely resemble traditional sports betting. For example, they offer moneyline, totals, and spread-style outcomes. These are typically found on licensed sportsbooks.
However, the NCAA argues that prediction markets lack comparable oversight. In contrast to regulated sportsbooks, many do not include basic consumer protections.
One major concern involves age limits. Many prediction platforms allow users aged 18 and older. Meanwhile, most legal sports betting markets require users to be at least 21.
Additionally, the NCAA raised concerns about marketing practices. In particular, advertising often appears in student-heavy environments. This creates confusion, especially when markets are presented as investments rather than gambling products.
The association also cited integrity gaps. These include weak geolocation controls and limited reporting of suspicious activity. As a result, operators are not required to coordinate with governing bodies, unlike traditional sportsbooks.
Transfer Portal Markets Ignite Controversy
The issue gained urgency after Kalshi withdrew a proposal tied to NCAA transfer portal activity. The proposal would have allowed trading on individual athletes’ transfer decisions. This followed strong backlash after Kalshi filed the plan with the CFTC.
In response, Baker strongly criticized the proposal. “The NCAA vehemently opposes college sports prediction markets,” he said. He added that student-athletes already face abuse linked to betting outcomes. Therefore, wagering on transfer decisions was deemed unacceptable.
— Charlie Baker (@CharlieBakerMA) December 18, 2025
Shortly afterward, Kalshi announced it would not launch the contracts. The company clarified that self-certification does not guarantee market approval. Notably, this followed a November dispute in which the NCAA asked Kalshi to stop implying an affiliation.
Ongoing Issues: Prop Betting and Player Harassment
Baker’s letter also addressed proposition betting in college sports. This category has already faced tighter restrictions in several states. Nevertheless, the NCAA warned that prediction markets may expand into prop-style events.
Furthermore, the association highlighted rising athlete harassment tied to betting activity. It called for cross-platform bans on abusive users. In addition, the NCAA recommended funding harm-reduction programs on college campuses.
Summary Table of NCAA Concerns Regarding College Sports Prediction Markets
| Area of Concern | NCAA’s Position |
|---|---|
| Age Restrictions | Markets allow users 18+, below most sportsbook minimums |
| Advertising Controls | Limited oversight and increased student exposure |
| Integrity Measures | Weak geolocation tools and reporting standards |
| Oversight and Collaboration | No required coordination with regulators or sports bodies |
| Prop Bets & Player Harassment | Heightened risk to athletes and need for enforcement |
A Call for Suspension and Future Safeguards
In conclusion, the NCAA has called for a pause on all college sports prediction markets. This suspension would remain in place while stronger regulations are developed. The association also offered its expertise to help shape future safeguards.
Ultimately, the rise of these markets has attracted federal scrutiny. At the same time, it has blurred the line between financial products and gambling activities. As a result, regulators now face mounting pressure to act.
- Author
Daniel Williams
